The Rise and Fall of Oscar Pistorius

Anyone who remembers the O.J. trial surely knew that the Pistorius trial was going to turn into a circus… and it has not disappointed. The verdict will come down on September 11th, and it comes down to this: Does the Judge believe Oscar’s version of what happened or does she believe the prosecution’s version of what happened?

IMG_0144-0.JPG

The Charges

Premeditated Murder: He knowingly intended to kill Reeva, or deliberately decided to kill an intruder. He would face a mandatory life sentence (25 years before he would be considered for parole)

Murder without Premeditation: He intended to kill, but without planning, in the heat of the moment. Sentencing is at the Judge’s discretion

Manslaughter (culpable homicide): He did not mean to kill Reeva, but acted recklessly or negligently in firing into the locked door
______________________________

Discharging a Firearm in Public (first count): this relates to a January 2013 incident where he fired a gun in a restaurant

Discharging a Firearm in Public (second count): this relates to a November 2012 incident where he fired a gun through the sunroof of a car

Illegal Possession of Ammunition: this relates to Pistorius having possession of .38 ammunition without a permit. He told the court he was holding the bullets for his father “for safe-keeping”

Pistorius could enjoy five years in prison for each of the two gun charges and up to fifteen years in prison for the ammunition charge.
______________________________

IMG_0143.JPG

The Prosecution’s Version

The prosecution had messages read in court showing that Reeva was scared of Pistorius. For example:

I was not flirting with anyone today. I feel sick that you suggested that and that you made a scene at the table and made us leave early. I’m terribly disappointed in how the day ended and how you left me. We are living in a double standard relationship where you can be mad about how I deal with stuff when you are very quick to act cold and offish when you’re unhappy. Every 5 seconds I hear how you dated another chick. You really have dated a lot of people yet you get upset if I mention ONE funny story with a long term boyfriend. I do everything to make you happy and to not say anything to rock the boat with u. You do everything to throw tantrums in front of people. I have been upset by you for 2 days now. I’m so upset I left Darren’s party early. SO upset. I can’t get that day back. I’m scared of you sometimes and how u snap at me and of how you will react to me.

The prosecution also argued that the couple had been fighting on the night of the shooting. Four separate witnesses stated they heard a woman screaming that night. The prosecution also contends that nobody was sleeping the night of the shooting, and this was consistent with the contents of Reeva’s stomach, as identified in the post-mortem.

The prosecution claims that Pistorius knew Reeva was in the bathroom, got his gun and walked down the hall with the intention of shooting her. They contend that he aimed the weapon as he fired through the closed door. The bullets were in a “good grouping” and the prosecution stated that this was the case because he was speaking with Reeva before he shot her. They argued that if he was worried about an intruder, the bullets would not have been grouped so closely.

Finally, the prosecution argues that even if the Judge accepts Oscar’s version of the facts, he should still be convicted of murder since he went to the toilet door with a high-powered weapon and fired with the intention to kill.

IMG_0145.JPG

Oscar’s Version

IMG_0147.JPG

IMG_0146.JPG

Why Oscar Will Be Convicted of Premeditated Murder (IMO)

– Oscar claims that he screamed at the intruder to get out of his house as he moved toward the bathroom. He also stated that he screamed back to the bedroom for Reeva to call the police. However, he claims Reeva never made a sound in the toilet – he testified, “She would have perceived the danger was coming closer. She would have stayed quiet.” In other words, he claims she was too frightened throughout this entire sequence to make a sound. I find this to be somewhat incredulous.

– the messages between Reeva and Oscar showed that they argued and that she may have been scared of him. This would not be enough by itself. However, four separate witnesses also testified that they heard a woman screaming that night. This includes one neighbor who testified she was “petrified” after waking to a woman’s “terrifying screams.” There were “bloodcurdling” screams and then “bang, bang, bang, bang.” This is a much more reasonable explanation for me than Reeva being too frightened to make a sound, as she was about to be shot and killed.

______________________________

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Rise and Fall of Oscar Pistorius

  1. Sam says:

    You should be a lawyer or something.

  2. runsaltrun says:

    REALLY interesting post. I have been semi-following the trial, but I understand it a lot more after reading this. Sadly I’ve always thought he was guilty of pre-meditation. The whole situation is just terrible.

  3. Ugh, this story just makes me really upset. When the news first broke last Valentine’s Day, it really shook me to my core.

  4. pauldburton says:

    Interesting read. I, too, think he is guilty of premeditated murder.

  5. Andrea says:

    From the details I’ve read I’ve been convinced it was intentional, but I’m even more certain after reading your post and some of the details that I hadn’t heard. It’s so sad for so many reasons – mostly because a young woman is dead. It’s always hard to see people with talent throw it away with stupid decisions.

  6. milesbyriles says:

    Very thoughtful post!

  7. piratebobcat says:

    I don’t know man, it’s a tough one… I’m just glad I’m not on that jury.

  8. Rachel B says:

    This is wild!! I think the whole thing is screwed up regardless of how you look at it.. pretty rough. I had mixed feelings about Pistorious before this happened – in college I wrote a paper analyzing the mechanics of his prosthetics and came out of it actually feeling that there was an advantage over a human leg.. he is an amazing athlete, but definitely a controversial one!

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s